|
History & Evolution of Oriental Rugs & Carpets |
Nomadic Origins |
|
To most people the concept of the rug, especially the pile rug, is virtually
synonymous with the Orient, above all Persia and Turkey. Flatwoven floor
coverings in plain weave or tapestry technique are to all intents ubiquitous.
They were developed all over the world, in various materials, from the
earliest times by all peoples who possessed the skill of weaving. In the
case of knotted or pile carpets and rugs, the source is not so generalized.
There is no doubt that the Middle East from Persia to Turkey became the main
region for knotted carpet production from the Middle Ages onward, but it is
very unlikely they were invented and first
produced there.
Pile carpets are most immediately a decorative textile substitute for furry
hides or sheepskins. Like the latter, their function relates to insulation
and comfort as well as décor. Such woven versions of hides or hide rugs
evolved for various reasons. First, by shearing the animals and weaving the
rugs out of the wool, it was no longer necessary to kill the animals to have
a rug. And by weaving the rug it became possible to make it into a piece of
decoration as well. One could dye hides in one color, or in several swaths
of color, but it was not easy to make anything approaching a design in this
way, at least not with any intricacy or permanence.
|
|
|
But a woven pile rug, could be given some sort of design, just like flatwoven textiles, while also imitating the texture, density, and protective quality of fur hides. This
is how the pile rug came to be born, but the question is where?
From the outset it seems improbable that such an adaptation of fur hides
took place in the warm climate of the Middle East, except for the
mountainous regions of Turkey, the Caucasus, and Persia. But mainstream
Oriental rug weaving has always been primarily an urban industry, not a
production of remote highlands. Moreover, the many archaeological
discoveries made in the last century tend to indicate that the earliest
carpets were produced and invented beyond Central Asia in the High Altai
Mountains of Siberia to the north and west of Mongolia. The inhabitants
there were tent-dwelling nomads whose material culture was dominated by
textile production. Such people required rugs to protect them from the
elements, in addition to embellishing their domestic environment. It seems
that these peoples created the knotted pile carpet by about 600 B.C., if not
earlier. |
 |
The specific evidence for this comes from the discoveries made by Russian
archaeologists at the frozen tombs of Bashadar and Pazyryk in the High
Altai region. The site of Bashadar produced a fragment of a pile carpet
carbon dated to the sixth century B.C. Unfortunately, no pattern is
discernible on this fragment, but at Pazyryrk another pile carpet was
discovered damaged but virtually intact, datable to the fifth or fourth
century B.C. After conservation, its color and design turned out to be
nothing less than astounding. The center of the rug had a king of chessboard
design with small floral motifs in each square. The borders also had floral
designs, as well as a frieze of horsemen, one of griffins, and another of
fallow deer. The palette had rich reds, soft greens, blue, and gold, with a
velvety pile.
Because of its design and technical sophistication, some scholars have
doubted that the |
|
Pazyryk carpet was a product nomadic weaving. The frieze of
horseman and the floral designs are clearly related to ancient Persian art, especially the reliefs at the great site of Persepolis. The weaving
technique is also very fine, which, to some scholars at least, suggests urban
workmanship or origin. Consequently, the Pazyryk piece has often been touted
as the world's oldest Persian rug. But this is most unlikely. Other frozen
tombs at Pazyryk produced fragments of ancient Persian flatwoven tapestry
textiles with figural decoration. Since such textiles were imported by the
Altai nomads, it is easy to see how designs from Persian court art could
have reached them. The desire to imitate such intricate tapestry designs
also explains why the weavers utilized a finely knotted technique, in order
to reproduce such delicacy and detail. In addition, the frieze of deer is
not Persian. They come from the local repertory of Nomadic “Scythian” art. |
The evidence of the wool and dyes in the carpet is also decisive. The wool
is identical in type to the wool of sheepskin hides found in other tombs at
Pazyryk, which were clearly local. The red dye in the carpet is made from lac or
kermesic acid, derived from insects, and the particular type of lac is
specifically Polish or Baltic in origin. This dye would have been more
readily available to the wide-ranging Eurasian nomads who lived from Eastern
Europe to the High Altai than to the ancient Persians far to the south. It
is therefore most likely that the Pazyryk carpet was woven locally by
nomadic peoples, even though its design reflected the cosmopolitan
influences of far-off regions. Scholarship has come to recognize, moreover,
that nomadic Asiatic weavings – rugs, tapestries, and embroideries –
produced at various times and places generally tend to reflect the impact of
urban textile production from the Middle East. The Pazyryk carpet is simply
an early example of this phenomenon.
But even if knotted pile carpets were developed by Central Asian or Altaic
nomads, the idea, if not the actual carpets themselves would have reached
the Middle East by ancient times where the technique would have been adopted
in local production. It is very likely that the ancient Persians also made
knotted carpets like their nomadic neighbors to the north, but these have not been
preserved. Nor do we have actual pile carpets preserved from Greek and Roman
culture.
|
|
|
Classical textual references to carpets exist, but they are
ambiguous; they could simply refer to flatwoven floor coverings or
blankets. Not until late antiquity in the burials of fifth-century A.D.
Roman Egypt do we again encounter actual pile carpets, made now in a looped
technique. Around the same time there is also continued evidence of carpet
production from Central Asia and the Caucasus, where pile carpet fragments
have been discovered in caves. Fragments of first century A.D. pile rugs
discovered on the western periphery of China and Tibet suggest that the
nomadic tradition of the knotted carpet spread east and southward from the
Altai region as well.
It is not until the Early Islamic period (seventh to ninth centuries) that
the evidence for carpet production again picks up in the archaeological
record, and once again it is the dry climate of Egypt that has facilitated
the survival of the actual carpets or fragments, especially at Fostat
outside old Cairo. This site was actually the rubbish dump for the city, and
it it has produced an extensive series of carpet fragments, a number of
which are Early Islamic in date. The fragments are small, but one can
discern designs of simple floral and geometric type in what would have been
allover repeat patterns. Given the limited evidence available, it is hard to
generalize about the scale and extent of carpet production in the early
Islamic Middle East. It is not until the thirteenth century in Anatolia or
Turkey that we finally encounter an actual corpus of surviving large
fragments or nearly complete pile rugs. These are preserved in the mosques
founded by the new Seljuk Turkish dynasty that has recently come to power
there.
The Seljuk Turks were originally nomads from Central Asia who entered Persia
and then Anatolia in the eleventh century after their conversion
to Islam. Over a century ago, even before the discoveries at Bashadar and
Pazyryk, the great pioneer rug scholar, Alois Riegl, was of the opinion that
it was such nomadic Turkic peoples from Central Asia who first introduced
the knotted pile carpet to the Islamic Middle East around this time. The
discoveries at Fostat, however, show that the knotted carpet was already
known in the Early Islamic period. Still, Riegl was probably correct in
emphasizing the role of Turks from Central Asia, who would have brought with
them the ancient tradition of pile carpet weaving from their ancestral
Altaic homeland. Turks were already a political and military force in ninth
century Egypt, and they were probably responsible for the earliest pile rug
production evidenced at Fostat. It is therefore highly probable that when
the Turks became a dominant elite across the Islamic Middle East in the
tenth and eleventh centuries, the knotted carpet finally achieved its
position as a major medium of artistic production under their patronage.
From this point on, from Turkey into Persia, the tradition of the Oriental
knotted pile carpet as we know it began to evolve continuously down to the
present time.
|
| |